The expression advocates a disproportionately aggressive response to adversity. As a substitute of constructing one of the best of a foul state of affairs, the saying suggests actively inflicting hurt or discomfort upon others as a type of retaliation or a approach to deal with private setbacks. For instance, if one experiences monetary hardship, somewhat than looking for options, the expression is likely to be interpreted as justifying actions that negatively influence these round them.
Such a philosophy lacks inherent advantages and carries vital damaging penalties. Traditionally, adopting such a mindset can result in societal breakdown and interpersonal battle. Constructive approaches to difficult circumstances, reminiscent of resilience, problem-solving, and looking for help, are demonstrably simpler and useful in the long run. Furthermore, actions motivated by this angle usually erode belief, harm relationships, and may end up in authorized repercussions.